Congratulations! you have passed level one
Há 12 anos
quinta-feira, setembro 25, 2008
quarta-feira, setembro 24, 2008
olho manson
Pouco dormi. Acordei completamente destruído. E o meu olho direito está, neste momento, estilo manson.
terça-feira, setembro 23, 2008
sete dias
falta exactamente uma semana. agudiza-se o meu aspecto cadavérico. creio que pouco sangue ainda me corre pelas veias. cafeína agora. aumentam as dúvidas. enfim, faltam sete dias.
segunda-feira, setembro 22, 2008
quarta-feira, setembro 17, 2008
thursday night fever
* james murphy a passar disco no lux hoje e eu em casa a escrever sobre direitos fundamentais. esta noite a pista era eu. acho que me vou matar.
sábado, setembro 13, 2008
sexta-feira, setembro 12, 2008
The "Retro-Sexual" Male Code
The Retrosexual Code
OK folks, I have had it. I've taken all I can stand and I can't stand no more. Every time my TV is on, all that can be seen is effeminate men prancing about, redecorating houses and talking about foreign concepts like "style" and "feng shui." Heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, transsexual, metrosexual, non-sexual; blue, green, and purple-sexual bogus definitions have taken over the urban and suburban world!
Real men of the world, stand up, scratch your butt, belch, and yell "ENOUGH!" I hereby announce the start of a new offensive in the culture wars, the Retrosexual movement.
The Code:
A Retrosexual, no matter what the women insists, PAYS FOR THE DATE.
A Retrosexual opens doors for a lady. Even for the ones that fit that term only because they are female.
A Retrosexual DEALS with IT, be it a flat tire, break-in into your home, or a natural disaster, you DEAL WITH IT.
A Retrosexual not only eats red meat, he often kills it himself.
A Retrosexual doesn't worry about living to be 90. It's not how long you live, but how well. If you're 90 years old and still smoking cigars and drinking, I salute you.
A Retrosexual does not use more hair or skin products than a woman. Women have several supermarket aisles of stuff. Retrosexuals need an endcap (possibly 2 endcaps if you include shaving goods).
A Retrosexual does not dress in clothes from Hot Topic when he's 30 years old.
A Retrosexual should know how to properly kill stuff (or people) if need be.
This falls under the "Dealing with IT" portion of The Code.
A Retrosexual watches no TV show with "Queer" in the title.
A Retrosexual does not let neighbors screw up rooms in his house on national TV.
A Retrosexual should not give up excessive amounts of manliness for women.
Some is inevitable, but major reinvention of yourself will only lead to you becoming a frou-frou little puss, and in the long run, she ain't worth it.
A Retrosexual is allowed to seek professional help for major mental stress such as drug/alcohol addiction, death of your entire family in a freak tree chipper accident, favorite sports team being moved to a different city, favorite bird dog expiring, etc. You are NOT allowed to see a shrink because Daddy didn't pay you enough attention. Daddy was busy DEALING WITH IT. When you screwed up, he DEALT with you.
A Retrosexual will have at least one outfit in his wardrobe designed to conceal himself from prey.
A Retrosexual knows how to tie a Windsor knot when wearing a tie - and ONLY a Windsor knot.
A Retrosexual should have at least one good wound he can brag about getting.
A Retrosexual knows how to use a basic set of tools. If you can't hammer a nail, or drill a straight hole, practice in secret until you can - or be rightfully ridiculed for the wuss you be.
A Retrosexual knows that owning a gun is not a sign that your are riddled with fear, guns are TOOLS and are often essential to DEAL WITH IT. Plus it's just plain fun to shoot.
Crying. There are very few reason that a Retrosexual may cry, and none of them have to do with TV commercials, movies, or soap operas. Sports teams are sometimes a reason to cry, but the preferred method of release is swearing or throwing the remote control. Some reasons a Retrosexual can cry include (but are not limited to) death of a loved one, death of a pet (fish do NOT count as pets in this case), loss of a major body part.
A Retrosexual man's favorite movie isn't "Maid in Manhattan" (unless that refers to some foxy French maid sitting in a huge tub of brandy or whiskey), or "Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood." Acceptable ones may include any of the Dirty Harry or Nameless Drifter movies (Clint in his better days), Rambo I or II, the Dirty Dozen, The Godfather trilogy, Scarface, The Road Warrior, The Die Hard series, Caddyshack, Rocky I, II, or III, Full Metal Jacket, any James Bond Movie, Raging Bull, Bullitt, any Bruce Lee movie, Apocalypse Now, Goodfellas, Reservoir Dogs, Fight Club, etc.etc.
When a Retrosexual is on a crowded bus and or a commuter train, and a pregnant woman, hell, any woman gets on, that Retrosexual stands up and offers his seat to that woman, then looks around at the other so-called men still in their seats with a disgusted "you punks" look on his face.
A Retrosexual knows how to say the Pledge properly, and with the correct emphasis and pronunciation. He also knows the words to the Star Spangled Banner.
A Retrosexual will have hobbies and habits his wife and mother do not understand, but that are essential to his manliness, in that they offset the acceptable manliness decline he suffers when married/engaged in a serious healthy relationship - i.e., hunting, boxing, shot putting, shooting, cigars, car maintenance.
A Retrosexual knows how to sharpen his own knives and kitchen utensils.
A Retrosexual man can drive in snow (hell, a blizzard) without sliding all over or driving under 20 mph, without anxiety, and without high-centering his ride on a plow berm.
A Retrosexual man can chop down a tree and make it land where he wants.
Wherever it lands is where he damn well wanted it to land.
A Retrosexual will give up his seat on a bus to not only any women but any elderly person or person in military dress (except officers above 2nd Lt)
NOTE: The person in military dress may turn down the offer but the Retrosexual man will ALWAYS make the offer to them and thank them for serving their country.
A Retrosexual man doesn't need a contract -- a handshake is good enough. He will always stand by his word even if circumstances change or the other person deceived him.
A Retrosexual man doesn't immediately look to sue someone when he does something stupid and hurts himself. We understand that sometimes in the process of doing things we get hurt and we just DEAL WITH IT.
OK folks, I have had it. I've taken all I can stand and I can't stand no more. Every time my TV is on, all that can be seen is effeminate men prancing about, redecorating houses and talking about foreign concepts like "style" and "feng shui." Heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, transsexual, metrosexual, non-sexual; blue, green, and purple-sexual bogus definitions have taken over the urban and suburban world!
Real men of the world, stand up, scratch your butt, belch, and yell "ENOUGH!" I hereby announce the start of a new offensive in the culture wars, the Retrosexual movement.
The Code:
A Retrosexual, no matter what the women insists, PAYS FOR THE DATE.
A Retrosexual opens doors for a lady. Even for the ones that fit that term only because they are female.
A Retrosexual DEALS with IT, be it a flat tire, break-in into your home, or a natural disaster, you DEAL WITH IT.
A Retrosexual not only eats red meat, he often kills it himself.
A Retrosexual doesn't worry about living to be 90. It's not how long you live, but how well. If you're 90 years old and still smoking cigars and drinking, I salute you.
A Retrosexual does not use more hair or skin products than a woman. Women have several supermarket aisles of stuff. Retrosexuals need an endcap (possibly 2 endcaps if you include shaving goods).
A Retrosexual does not dress in clothes from Hot Topic when he's 30 years old.
A Retrosexual should know how to properly kill stuff (or people) if need be.
This falls under the "Dealing with IT" portion of The Code.
A Retrosexual watches no TV show with "Queer" in the title.
A Retrosexual does not let neighbors screw up rooms in his house on national TV.
A Retrosexual should not give up excessive amounts of manliness for women.
Some is inevitable, but major reinvention of yourself will only lead to you becoming a frou-frou little puss, and in the long run, she ain't worth it.
A Retrosexual is allowed to seek professional help for major mental stress such as drug/alcohol addiction, death of your entire family in a freak tree chipper accident, favorite sports team being moved to a different city, favorite bird dog expiring, etc. You are NOT allowed to see a shrink because Daddy didn't pay you enough attention. Daddy was busy DEALING WITH IT. When you screwed up, he DEALT with you.
A Retrosexual will have at least one outfit in his wardrobe designed to conceal himself from prey.
A Retrosexual knows how to tie a Windsor knot when wearing a tie - and ONLY a Windsor knot.
A Retrosexual should have at least one good wound he can brag about getting.
A Retrosexual knows how to use a basic set of tools. If you can't hammer a nail, or drill a straight hole, practice in secret until you can - or be rightfully ridiculed for the wuss you be.
A Retrosexual knows that owning a gun is not a sign that your are riddled with fear, guns are TOOLS and are often essential to DEAL WITH IT. Plus it's just plain fun to shoot.
Crying. There are very few reason that a Retrosexual may cry, and none of them have to do with TV commercials, movies, or soap operas. Sports teams are sometimes a reason to cry, but the preferred method of release is swearing or throwing the remote control. Some reasons a Retrosexual can cry include (but are not limited to) death of a loved one, death of a pet (fish do NOT count as pets in this case), loss of a major body part.
A Retrosexual man's favorite movie isn't "Maid in Manhattan" (unless that refers to some foxy French maid sitting in a huge tub of brandy or whiskey), or "Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood." Acceptable ones may include any of the Dirty Harry or Nameless Drifter movies (Clint in his better days), Rambo I or II, the Dirty Dozen, The Godfather trilogy, Scarface, The Road Warrior, The Die Hard series, Caddyshack, Rocky I, II, or III, Full Metal Jacket, any James Bond Movie, Raging Bull, Bullitt, any Bruce Lee movie, Apocalypse Now, Goodfellas, Reservoir Dogs, Fight Club, etc.etc.
When a Retrosexual is on a crowded bus and or a commuter train, and a pregnant woman, hell, any woman gets on, that Retrosexual stands up and offers his seat to that woman, then looks around at the other so-called men still in their seats with a disgusted "you punks" look on his face.
A Retrosexual knows how to say the Pledge properly, and with the correct emphasis and pronunciation. He also knows the words to the Star Spangled Banner.
A Retrosexual will have hobbies and habits his wife and mother do not understand, but that are essential to his manliness, in that they offset the acceptable manliness decline he suffers when married/engaged in a serious healthy relationship - i.e., hunting, boxing, shot putting, shooting, cigars, car maintenance.
A Retrosexual knows how to sharpen his own knives and kitchen utensils.
A Retrosexual man can drive in snow (hell, a blizzard) without sliding all over or driving under 20 mph, without anxiety, and without high-centering his ride on a plow berm.
A Retrosexual man can chop down a tree and make it land where he wants.
Wherever it lands is where he damn well wanted it to land.
A Retrosexual will give up his seat on a bus to not only any women but any elderly person or person in military dress (except officers above 2nd Lt)
NOTE: The person in military dress may turn down the offer but the Retrosexual man will ALWAYS make the offer to them and thank them for serving their country.
A Retrosexual man doesn't need a contract -- a handshake is good enough. He will always stand by his word even if circumstances change or the other person deceived him.
A Retrosexual man doesn't immediately look to sue someone when he does something stupid and hurts himself. We understand that sometimes in the process of doing things we get hurt and we just DEAL WITH IT.
quinta-feira, setembro 11, 2008
Radiohead: Live In Concert
"
When I think of the best concerts I've seen, I always flash back to Pink Floyd in early 1972. Almost two years before the band released what would become Dark Side of the Moon, Pink Floyd performed the entire suite of songs to the amazement of us all. We'd never heard any of the songs (then titled Eclipse: A Piece for Assorted Lunatics), and with its quadrophonic sound, it remains the most massive musical surprise I've experienced.
Radiohead's show at the Santa Barbara Bowl came as close for musicianship and creativity as any show I've seen in 37 years. I've seen a lot of shows.
These guys write great songs, and sometimes you can even sing along to them, but what they do better than any band is create a sonic adventure — a soundscape which, at its best, stretches time and allows the mind to wander and rejuvenate. I think of it as resetting the synapses. Creativity breeds creativity. When the music was over, I felt unboxed and changed and pretty darn happy. Drugs are overrated; music is underrated.
Back in February, All Songs Considered invited Radiohead's Thom Yorke on the show to discuss the music he loved. He was happy to talk about someone else's music, after months of being asked about the record business and the decision he and his band made to release In Rainbows as a pay-what-you-want download. So Thom Yorke played DJ for us, turned me and others on to new music, and talked about creating In Rainbows. We had a good chat, but our meeting was long-distance; he was in Oxford and I was in Washington, D.C. We made mention of meeting when the band came to America for its tour.
So after the show, my guide Laura Eldeiry of the band's PR firm, Nasty Little Man, told me to wait around for Thom; that he'd come around and we'd have that face-to-face we'd talked about.
I've never understood how someone can perform and create for more than two hours and come down to earth enough to carry on a conversation. I could never do it. When Thom finally arrived, he said he was blasted (tired, that is), but he looked happy and satisfied. We talked a bit of politics; Barack Obama's speech at the Democratic National Convention took place in tandem with the Radiohead show.
I told him how unusual I thought it was to have a thinker like Barack Obama running for president; Yorke talked about corruption and lobbying in British politics, and said to be careful about pinning all of your hopes on one person.
Later, on the car ride home, I thought of the words to "Videotape" from Radiohead's In Rainbows: "Today has been the most perfect day I have ever seen."
"
ouvir o concerto na íntegra aqui.
When I think of the best concerts I've seen, I always flash back to Pink Floyd in early 1972. Almost two years before the band released what would become Dark Side of the Moon, Pink Floyd performed the entire suite of songs to the amazement of us all. We'd never heard any of the songs (then titled Eclipse: A Piece for Assorted Lunatics), and with its quadrophonic sound, it remains the most massive musical surprise I've experienced.
Radiohead's show at the Santa Barbara Bowl came as close for musicianship and creativity as any show I've seen in 37 years. I've seen a lot of shows.
These guys write great songs, and sometimes you can even sing along to them, but what they do better than any band is create a sonic adventure — a soundscape which, at its best, stretches time and allows the mind to wander and rejuvenate. I think of it as resetting the synapses. Creativity breeds creativity. When the music was over, I felt unboxed and changed and pretty darn happy. Drugs are overrated; music is underrated.
Back in February, All Songs Considered invited Radiohead's Thom Yorke on the show to discuss the music he loved. He was happy to talk about someone else's music, after months of being asked about the record business and the decision he and his band made to release In Rainbows as a pay-what-you-want download. So Thom Yorke played DJ for us, turned me and others on to new music, and talked about creating In Rainbows. We had a good chat, but our meeting was long-distance; he was in Oxford and I was in Washington, D.C. We made mention of meeting when the band came to America for its tour.
So after the show, my guide Laura Eldeiry of the band's PR firm, Nasty Little Man, told me to wait around for Thom; that he'd come around and we'd have that face-to-face we'd talked about.
I've never understood how someone can perform and create for more than two hours and come down to earth enough to carry on a conversation. I could never do it. When Thom finally arrived, he said he was blasted (tired, that is), but he looked happy and satisfied. We talked a bit of politics; Barack Obama's speech at the Democratic National Convention took place in tandem with the Radiohead show.
I told him how unusual I thought it was to have a thinker like Barack Obama running for president; Yorke talked about corruption and lobbying in British politics, and said to be careful about pinning all of your hopes on one person.
Later, on the car ride home, I thought of the words to "Videotape" from Radiohead's In Rainbows: "Today has been the most perfect day I have ever seen."
"
ouvir o concerto na íntegra aqui.
Foi “para beber cerveja e embriagar-se” que o homem se tornou agricultor
Há dez mil anos ocorreu a chamada revolução do neolítico, quando os seres humanos se tornaram sedentários e começaram a cultivar a terra. Uma nova teoria defende que o homem se tornou agricultor “para beber cerveja e embriagar-se”, contrariando a ideia que tinha sido a procura de uma melhor alimentação o motivo da mudança.
A teoria é da autoria do biólogo e historiador natural alemão, Josef H. Reichholf, e vem publicada no seu livro “Por que é que os homens se tornaram sedentários?”, lançado na Alemanha. A obra explica as causas da revolução que mais tarde estaria na origem dos povos e das religiões.
Josef H. Reichholf parte do pressuposto que “quando os caçadores recolectores abandonaram a sua forma de vida e alimentação tradicional teria que ter uma vantagem inicial”. No princípio, sublinha, “o cultivo de plantas não trouxe nenhuma vantagem visível para a sobrevivência”.
Por esse motivo, o cientista alemão considera que a teoria até hoje defendida, que a humanidade começou a cultivar plantas, abandonou a vida nómada e se estabeleceu de maneira permanente num sítio para se alimentar melhor, está totalmente errada.
Segundo o mesmo livro, as colheitas iniciais eram demasiado reduzidas e o cultivo da terra muito trabalhoso, o que implica que a sobrevivência não podia ser garantida em exclusivo através da agricultura. Josef H. Reichholf defende que o homem do período neolítico continuou a caçar e a ser recolector para subsistir.
"A agricultura surgiu de uma situação de abundância"
Outra das teorias criticada no livro do biólogo alemão é a que indica que nas primeiras regiões onde a humanidade se fixou, situadas entre o Egipto e a Mesopotâmia (actuais zonas não desérticas do território do Iraque), havia pouca caça e muita vegetação.
Josef H. Reichholf diz que essa teoria é absurda ao pressupor que uma zona com muita vegetação possa ao mesmo tempo não ter animais selvagens. O cientista sublinha que “era totalmente diferente” e que a caça não escasseava.
Para o biólogo “a agricultura surgiu de uma situação de abundância” e assegura que “a humanidade experimentou o cultivo dos cereais e usou os grãos como complemento alimentar. A intenção incial não era fazer pão, mas antes fabricar cerveja através da fermentação”.
As declarações de Josef H. Reichholf foram registadas durante a apresentação do seu livro, onde o cientista alemão fez questão de frisar que a humanidade sempre sentiu necessidade de alcançar estados de embriaguez com drogas naturais que lhe “transmitem a sensação de transcendência, de abandono do próprio corpo”.
A importância dos xamãs
Na teoria agora apresentada, os xamãs, espécie de líderes espirituais que entram em transe e manifestam poderes sobrenaturais e invocam espíritos da natureza, teriam tido um papel de destaque na revolução neolítica. Seriam eles que conheceriam os feitos e as dosagens das drogas, ou seja, do álcool, cogumelos e plantas, tomados durante as cerimónias de carácter religioso.Josef H. Reichholf destaca a importância que a cerveja e o vinho terão tido no fomento do sentido de unidade de um povo ou de uma tribo.
Da mesma maneira, defende que o pão só começou a produzir-se quando se conseguiu cultivar cereais em abundância. O cientista sublinhou que a fermentação é um processo mais antigo, “a capacidade de fermentar cerveja não foi algo espontâneo. A humanidade já conhecia antes o processo fermentação da fruta”.
faz sentido faz.
A teoria é da autoria do biólogo e historiador natural alemão, Josef H. Reichholf, e vem publicada no seu livro “Por que é que os homens se tornaram sedentários?”, lançado na Alemanha. A obra explica as causas da revolução que mais tarde estaria na origem dos povos e das religiões.
Josef H. Reichholf parte do pressuposto que “quando os caçadores recolectores abandonaram a sua forma de vida e alimentação tradicional teria que ter uma vantagem inicial”. No princípio, sublinha, “o cultivo de plantas não trouxe nenhuma vantagem visível para a sobrevivência”.
Por esse motivo, o cientista alemão considera que a teoria até hoje defendida, que a humanidade começou a cultivar plantas, abandonou a vida nómada e se estabeleceu de maneira permanente num sítio para se alimentar melhor, está totalmente errada.
Segundo o mesmo livro, as colheitas iniciais eram demasiado reduzidas e o cultivo da terra muito trabalhoso, o que implica que a sobrevivência não podia ser garantida em exclusivo através da agricultura. Josef H. Reichholf defende que o homem do período neolítico continuou a caçar e a ser recolector para subsistir.
"A agricultura surgiu de uma situação de abundância"
Outra das teorias criticada no livro do biólogo alemão é a que indica que nas primeiras regiões onde a humanidade se fixou, situadas entre o Egipto e a Mesopotâmia (actuais zonas não desérticas do território do Iraque), havia pouca caça e muita vegetação.
Josef H. Reichholf diz que essa teoria é absurda ao pressupor que uma zona com muita vegetação possa ao mesmo tempo não ter animais selvagens. O cientista sublinha que “era totalmente diferente” e que a caça não escasseava.
Para o biólogo “a agricultura surgiu de uma situação de abundância” e assegura que “a humanidade experimentou o cultivo dos cereais e usou os grãos como complemento alimentar. A intenção incial não era fazer pão, mas antes fabricar cerveja através da fermentação”.
As declarações de Josef H. Reichholf foram registadas durante a apresentação do seu livro, onde o cientista alemão fez questão de frisar que a humanidade sempre sentiu necessidade de alcançar estados de embriaguez com drogas naturais que lhe “transmitem a sensação de transcendência, de abandono do próprio corpo”.
A importância dos xamãs
Na teoria agora apresentada, os xamãs, espécie de líderes espirituais que entram em transe e manifestam poderes sobrenaturais e invocam espíritos da natureza, teriam tido um papel de destaque na revolução neolítica. Seriam eles que conheceriam os feitos e as dosagens das drogas, ou seja, do álcool, cogumelos e plantas, tomados durante as cerimónias de carácter religioso.Josef H. Reichholf destaca a importância que a cerveja e o vinho terão tido no fomento do sentido de unidade de um povo ou de uma tribo.
Da mesma maneira, defende que o pão só começou a produzir-se quando se conseguiu cultivar cereais em abundância. O cientista sublinhou que a fermentação é um processo mais antigo, “a capacidade de fermentar cerveja não foi algo espontâneo. A humanidade já conhecia antes o processo fermentação da fruta”.
faz sentido faz.
quarta-feira, setembro 10, 2008
sábado, setembro 06, 2008
touradas
Sobre o parecer da ERC no âmbito do horário televisivo a que devem ser submetidas as touradas:
O trabalho de um jurista é antes de mais técnico-interpretativo.
"As crianças e os jovens são diariamente expostos a influências, desprovidas de arrimo na tradição ou sequer valor cultural, que, de muito longe, são mais violentas e prejudiciais do que as touradas - e nem nesses casos, necessariamente, cede a liberdade de programação." - a isto chama-se um argumento de maioria de razão.
"A questão do "antes" ou "depois" das 22h30 acaba por passar ao lado de uma qualquer atitude reguladora dos valores que dominam a prática televisiva em Portugal." - esta foi uma questão colocada, tendo, por essa razão, melhor ou pior, obtido uma resposta.
Mais, a actividade de regulação não pode, em caso algum, sobrepor-se a liberdades, ou seja, a direitos fundamentais essenciais como os de liberdade. A liberdade de programação (faculdade da liberdade de pensamento) é uma decorrência disso, logo o problema não estará assim em qualquer actividade regulatória mas, obviamente, na sociedade. Por muito que pareça bem a elites intelectuais ou algo que lhes valha, teses neo-platonianas terão sempre uma vertente de extremismo segregacionista e padecerão sempre do erro de Marx, a diferença existente entre as pessoas.
Sobre o texto de João Lopes.
O trabalho de um jurista é antes de mais técnico-interpretativo.
"As crianças e os jovens são diariamente expostos a influências, desprovidas de arrimo na tradição ou sequer valor cultural, que, de muito longe, são mais violentas e prejudiciais do que as touradas - e nem nesses casos, necessariamente, cede a liberdade de programação." - a isto chama-se um argumento de maioria de razão.
"A questão do "antes" ou "depois" das 22h30 acaba por passar ao lado de uma qualquer atitude reguladora dos valores que dominam a prática televisiva em Portugal." - esta foi uma questão colocada, tendo, por essa razão, melhor ou pior, obtido uma resposta.
Mais, a actividade de regulação não pode, em caso algum, sobrepor-se a liberdades, ou seja, a direitos fundamentais essenciais como os de liberdade. A liberdade de programação (faculdade da liberdade de pensamento) é uma decorrência disso, logo o problema não estará assim em qualquer actividade regulatória mas, obviamente, na sociedade. Por muito que pareça bem a elites intelectuais ou algo que lhes valha, teses neo-platonianas terão sempre uma vertente de extremismo segregacionista e padecerão sempre do erro de Marx, a diferença existente entre as pessoas.
Sobre o texto de João Lopes.
sexta-feira, setembro 05, 2008
incesto é fixe
Se a madonna é a rainha da pop, a britney spears é a princesa. sendo mãe e filha do universo pop, a foto abaixo é incesto (pop). logo, incesto é fixe.
Pussycat Spears
depois do pere ubu, do pedro gomes e de eu próprio afirmar(mos), digamos, a "brutalidade" que envolve a personagem britney spears, "vem de lá" o tarantino convidá-la para entrar num seu filme. agora,as dúvidas dissiparam-se.
gimme more.
quarta-feira, setembro 03, 2008
vestimenta
isto de ir para o trabalho vestido que nem o tipo dos alice in chains (menos os sapatos e a droga) é brutal!
terça-feira, setembro 02, 2008
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)
